Pages

Please subscribe by clicking on the button below :)

Thursday, February 23, 2017

Week 2 Research Proposal

Research Proposal
1. Why research Staphylococcus Aureus DNA extraction?
In general, experimental research is important because it allows us to reinforce what we already know about organisms, but it can also open the door to new discoveries. For example, defining the best technique to extract DNA material from an organism can either confirm a hypothesis made on existing knowledge or it can lead us to the discovery of new information. In addition, determining the best method to extract DNA from a specific organism can be found valuable to an institution, as it can serve as a basis for the development of further investigations made on that subject. I will be conducting several experiments to extract DNA material from the Staphylococcus Aureus bacteria cells. Staphylococcus Aureus or S. aureus for short, is a bacterium that can be part of the normal skin flora of human beings and never cause a problem; it is estimated that 33% of Americans carry this microbe without illness (MRSA Tracking). However, if given the opportunity S. aureus will attack the body and cause illness; and what’s worse, is that many strains have developed resistance to widely used antibiotics such as Vancomycin and Methicillin making this seemingly harmless organism deadly under certain conditions (Gram-positive bacteria). Analyzing the DNA of this bacterium to understand how it developed this drug resistance is another important reason to figure out what is the best way extract its DNA as best as possible.

2. Research tactics.
There will be a total of 6 DNA extraction protocols (Determining an), one of which will be a commercial kit guaranteed to render high yields of quality DNA material (Ready-LyseTM lysozyme). Then I will analyze the extracted material using a microvolume UV-Vis spectrophotometer to quantify the results. The results that I will be observing are the concentration of DNA material and also the quality of the material extracted (260/280 and).

3. Variable table
Name
I/D/C
Symbol
Units
Description
Nucleic Acid Concentration
D

ng/uL
This figure will depend on the protocol used to extract DNA. The higher the value the more DNA material there was extracted.
Nucleic Acid Purity
D
260/230
unit-less ratio
This figure will help determine the ratio of pure DNA material there is through the extraction in contrast to organic contaminants such as proteins. The ideal 260/280 value is ~1.8, arbitrarily.
Method of Extraction
I
Protocol no.

There will six different methods used to extract the bacterium’s DNA and will identified as “Protocol…” followed by number 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5; for practical reasons.
Bacteria Sample
C


The bacteria used to determine the effectiveness of each extraction method will all come from the same isolated colonies (petri dish).
Equipment
C


Equipment used for centrifuging, heating, cooling, and measuring will all be the same throughout the different tests and trials thereafter.
Chemicals
C


Chemicals, such as alcohols and buffers will all come from the same source.

4. Overview of findings
Research question- 
     When comparing the quantity and quality of the DNA material extracted with the following methods: Boiling Protocol, TE Boiling Protocol, TE Freeze and Thaw Protocol, Lysis Protocol, and Meat Tenderizer Protocol, which DNA extraction protocol worked better? Which one extracted higher yields? Which one extracted better quality DNA?
Hypothesis-
      I think that Meat Tenderizer Protocol will extract better quality DNA in higher yields.

References
Developing an effective E-coli protocol. (n.d.). Raw data in preparation.
Gram-positive bacteria. (2011). In K. Rogers (Ed.), Bacteria and viruses. Retrieved from Gale Virtual Reference Library database. (Accession No. GALE|CX4040900042)
MRSA tracking. (2016, march 3). In Centers for disease control and prevention. Retrieved December 16, 2016, from https://www.cdc.gov/mrsa/tracking/
Ready-LyseTM lysozyme solution [Pamphlet]. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.epibio.com/docs/default-source/protocols/ready-lyse-lysozyme-solution.pdf?sfvrsn=6

260/280 and 260/230 ratios [Pamphlet]. (2008). Retrieved from http://www.nanodrop.com/Library/T009-NanoDrop%201000-&-NanoDrop%208000-Nucleic-Acid-Purity-Ratios.pdf

Thursday, February 16, 2017

Week 1 of the spring 2017 semester!


Hello to everyone: scholars, advisors, support staff, and readers. By submitting this, my first post of the semester, I feel like the spring of 2017 internship has officially begun.

My first order of business was to check in with my laboratory mentors, Matt and Josh, to debrief the objectives of this semester’s laboratory work. Coming in, I already had a clear idea of what I wanted to work on.

On Thursday I spoke to Matt, luckily our trains of thought where headed to the same station. That is to say, they think it would be great if I continued to work on the laboratory findings that I got last semester rather than initiate a new and possibly completely different project.

This made me happy because it means that I will have the opportunity to make sense of all the data that I have been gathering in a thorough and concise manner.

Last semester I worked on identifying an unknown bacterium which turned out to be Staphylococcus Aureus also known as S. Aureus. Then I ran it though different DNA extraction protocols to determine which method would yield more and better DNA material. However due to laboratory mistakes, including loss of data, I was not able to back my findings with strength.


On my next post I’ll write about my research on the bacterium itself, so that you get to know it and are able to relate my future posts beyond that.

Also, welcome to all the new scholars this semester. Please know that we are here to try to help, I know I speak on everyone's behalf because of the support that I got from everyone on my first semester's internship. And if we don't have an answer, we probably will know who to ask. 

Luis