1. Why research Staphylococcus aureus DNA extraction?
In microbiology,
experimental research is important because it allows us to reinforce what we
already know about organisms, but it can also open the door to new discoveries.
For example, defining the best technique to extract DNA material from an
organism can either confirm a hypothesis made on existing knowledge or it can
lead to the discovery of new information. Specifically, determining the best
method to extract DNA from microorganisms, such as bacteria, can be found
valuable to an academic institution, as it can serve as a basis for the
development of further investigations made on that subject. For this experiment,
protocols will be conducted to extract DNA material from the Staphylococcus aureus bacteria cells. Staphylococcus aureus or S. aureus for short is a bacterium that
can be part of the normal skin flora of human beings and never cause a problem;
the CDC calculates that 33% of Americans carry this microbe without illness (MRSA,
2016). However, if given the opportunity S.
aureus will attack the body and cause illness; and what’s worse, is that many
strains have developed resistance to widely used antibiotics such as Vancomycin
and Methicillin making this seemingly harmless organism deadly under certain conditions
(Gram-positive, 2011). While DNA extraction and analysis can be utilized for
bacterial and strain identification it can also serve to help develop a solution
for the surging worldwide problem of drug-resistant microorganisms, such as S.
aureus, tallying up another important reason to research micro-DNA extraction.
2. Research tactics.
There will be a total of six DNA
extraction protocols, which are: the Boiling Protocol, TE Boiling Protocol, TE Freeze and Thaw
Protocol, Lysis Protocol, and Meat Tenderizer Protocol (Haberkorn, James, & Leonetti, 2016),
measuring up to a commercial DNA extraction kit guaranteed to
render high yields of optimal quality DNA material (Ready-LyseTM, 2012). The extracted nuclei
acid will be analyzed using a microvolume UV-Vis spectrophotometer to qualitatively
quantify results. The values of interest that will be sought are the
concentration of nucleic acid measured by the absorbance of light and also the
quality of the material extracted calculated by the 260/280 ratio which is the nucleic
acid ratio of absorbance at the wavelengths of 260nm and 280nm respectively (260/280,
2008).
4. Overview of findings
Research question- When comparing the quantity and quality of
the DNA material extracted with the previously mentioned protocols, which DNA
extraction protocol worked better in comparison to the commercial DNA
extraction kit? Which one extracted higher yields? Which one extracted better
quality DNA?
Hypothesis- My hypothesis is that the Meat Tenderizer Protocol
will extract better quality DNA in higher yields, because of the intricacy of
the steps involved in the process.
References
Gram-positive bacteria. (2011). In K. Rogers (Ed.), Bacteria and viruses. Retrieved from
Gale Virtual Reference Library database. (Accession No. GALE|CX4040900042)
Haberkorn, M., James, J., & Leonetti, C. (20016). Developing an effective e-coli protocol.
Raw data in preparation, Phoenix College, Phoenix, AZ.
MRSA tracking. (2016, march 3). In Centers for disease control and prevention. Retrieved December 16,
2016, from https://www.cdc.gov/mrsa/tracking/
Ready-LyseTM lysozyme
solution [Pamphlet]. (2012). Retrieved from
http://www.epibio.com/docs/default-source/protocols/ready-lyse-lysozyme-solution.pdf?sfvrsn=6
260/280 and 260/230
ratios [Pamphlet]. (2008). Retrieved from
http://www.nanodrop.com/Library/T009-NanoDrop%201000-&-NanoDrop%208000-Nucleic-Acid-Purity-Ratios.pdf
Hey Luis, this bacteria sounds so interesting to research about, especially since it is carried by various Americans daily! It is almost similar to mine because my bacteria, Enterococcus faecalis, is also resistant to vancomycin. I wonder what is common in these two bacterias that allows them to be vancomycin-resistant?
ReplyDelete